STOP Telling Me to Change My Name. I Want the Whole World to Know My Guardian Angel Brothers are Mine.

I can’t get a job at a gas station. I don’t know how I’m going to feed and house myself. And, Yale President Peter Salovey just continues to tell disgusting lies about me to stop me from being able to save my life and lifelong human and civil rights career.

I keep getting the exceedingly unhelpful advice that I should just change my name and stop fighting for Justice and to restore Due Process and Equal Protection at Yale and Smith College and everywhere.

I seem to get this advice a lot from persons who are just trying to be oh so helpful, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they don’t want to be held accountable for their roles in the witch hunt at Yale that almost got me (an innocent anti-racism Yale grad student and civil rights attorney) killed and destroyed my life.

I will NEVER change my name. Allow me to repeat myself, louder, for those in the back: I will NEVER change my name.

I will NEVER stop fighting for Justice, not just for myself, but for everyone who has been falsely accused and vilified in the Fake News Press and mobbed to suicide by the Moral Outrage Industry via Trial by Twitter without Due Process.

I will NEVER stop fighting to restore Due Process and Equal Protection at Yale and Smith College and everywhere.

It makes me irate when people tell me to change my name.

It is my dead brothers’ name, and I want the whole world to know that they’re MINE.

When Daunte Wright’s family was speaking to the press, after he was shot and killed by a Brooklyn Center, MN police officer, I broke down and sobbed and screamed and wailed, just as Daunte Wright’s aunt sobbed and screamed and wailed into the microphone.

She said it didn’t matter if there was a warrant out for Daunte’s arrest. “We loved him,” she said.

“He was ours,” she cried out in raging grief.

I felt her anguish and pain in that moment.

That’s what I always say. I say that my beautiful red haired guardian angel brothers are MINE. And, I don’t care if they were or weren’t angels during their lifetimes. They were MINE. They are MINE.

They’re MINE.

So, I will NEVER change my name. I want the whole world to know that my beautiful guardian angel brothers, Aaron James Braasch (09/19/75 – 02/11/12) and Jacob Michael Braasch (01/28/86 – 02/02/10) are MY beautiful guardian angel brothers.

They left this world to protect me. They left this world to watch over me. They left this world to guide me through this hellish nightmare and keep me alive and lead me to where I need to be to do the most good.

They give me all of my best philosophical ideas. They tell me what to write.

I loved them. I love them. They’re mine.

I would give anything, even my life, to get to hold them for one more minute, to have one more chance to tell them how much I love and miss them.

I just want to be with them, where they are now. But, I know that I have a job to do here still, a job they are helping me complete.

But, for the rest of this life, I will walk the world alone, without my brothers, without my heart, without my soul.

So, don’t tell me to change my name.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

The Awesome Opening Brief from my Wonderful Attorneys at Randazza Legal Group from My Appeal for the Yale Campus Police Body Camera Footage from the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale

Here is a link to the pdf of the awesome opening brief from my wonderful attorneys at Randazza Legal Group from my appeal for the Yale Campus Police Body Camera Footage from the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale. I will do a thorough analysis of the brief asap.

https://app.luminpdf.com/viewer/606e73bb2246d200189f29eb

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Law and How to Fix It — My FINAL Abstract for the Next International Social Ontology Conference of my 2nd Dissertation Paper

My FINAL Abstract for the next International Social Ontology Conference of my 2nd Dissertation Paper.

It’s called: Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Law and How to Fix It:

Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Lawand How to Fix It

Abstract

In The Concept of Law, HLA Hart crafts a theory of legal systems as the union of primary, duty-imposing social rules of obligation and secondary, power-conferring social rules of authority.  The social group whose legal system it is confers authority upon the public officials of the legal system to promulgate, change, and adjudicate the primary duty-imposing social rules of obligation.  It is the citizenry who confers authority upon the public officials of a legal system.  If the public officials purport to make law beyond the constraints of what the social group accepts as valid, then the public officials have failed to make valid law.

Hart then makes a fatal error, undermining his entire legal theory, an error, which Ronald Dworkin famously recognized and exploited to great effect in Law’s Empire. Hart alienates the citizenry from their own legal system.  Hart does this to save the obligatory character of law.  Hart believes that this obligatory character only manifests in situations wherein everyone in the social group accepts the social rule.  

Hart recognizes that it would never be the case that all members of a social group would accept the social rules comprising their legal system.  So, he strips the citizenry of their legal system.  He makes the body of public officials the social group whose legal system it is.  But, this would mean that the public officials confer authority upon themselves and constrain themselves.  And, still, as Dworkin so astutely pointed out, no body of public officials accepts their social rules devoid of disagreement or dissent.

I believe there is a way to fix Hart’s fatal mistake, and craft a legal theory that returns a social group’s legal system to the citizenry.  The solution is to apply a Modified Lewisian/Hartian Account of Social Conventions to Hart’s legal system.  According to this account, what it is to be a social convention is to be a union of a primary, duty-imposing social convention of obligation and a secondary, power-conferring social convention of authority.  All social coordination requires authority.  

Hart’s necessary connection between obligatory character and unanimity of acceptance is severed. Social conventions are step public social goods, for which the public officials (authorities) are freeriding defectors, and the moment at which the social convention arises, the social group rests upon an equilibrium point.  No one would wish anyone party to the convention to unilaterally deviate, because the social convention would collapse.  Therefore, there is something closely akin to an obligation for all social group members party to the convention to continue to conform thereto. It is in this way that we can allow for disagreement and dissent about what the law is and should be, because we can have sub social groups that are step public goods in and of themselves that wax and wane over time.  The citizenry is a major player in its own legal system, conferring power upon public officials and constraining their authority.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Law and How to Fix It — My Abstract for the Next International Social Ontology Conference of my 2nd Dissertation Paper

This is just a draft of my Abstract for the next International Social Ontology Conference of my 2nd Dissertation Paper.

It’s called: Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Law and How to Fix It.

Here’s what I have so far for the abstract. It’s too long right now. I have to cut it down:

Hart’s Fatal Mistake in The Concept of Lawand How to Fix It

Abstract

In The Concept of Law, HLA Hart crafts a theory of legal systems as the union of primary, duty-imposing social rules of obligation and secondary, power-conferring social rules of authority.  The social group whose legal system it is confers authority upon the public officials of the legal system to promulgate, repeal, change, and adjudicate the primary duty-imposing social rules of obligation.  If a public official of the legal system oversteps her authority, she has not breached a duty or obligation; she has simply failed to make valid law within this legal system.  A social rule is a legal rule for this social group, because it is part of this legal system, and is valid according to the Rule of Recognition, the ultimate criterion of validity, the set of secondary power-conferring rules of authority, including the Rule of Change and the Rule of Adjudication.  The set of primary, duty-imposing rules of obligation of the social group whose legal system it is constrain the authority of the public officials of the legal system.  It is the citizenry who confers authority upon the public officials of a legal system. If the public officials purport to make law beyond the constraints of what the social group whose legal system it is accept as valid, then the public officials have failed to make valid law.

Hart then makes a fatal error, undermining his entire legal theory, an error, which Ronald Dworkin famously recognized and exploited to great effect in Law’s Empire.  Hart alienates the citizenry, the general public, the social group whose legal system it is from their own legal system. Hart does this to save the obligatory character of law.  Hart thinks the obligatory character of law is a social fact that arises from the fact that all of the members of a social group take the internal point of view towards the social rules that comprise their legal system.  They accept the social rules.  Hart believes that this obligatory character only manifests in situations wherein everyone in the social group accepts the social rule, and he believes that this will only occur when the social rule is a matter of great importance to the social group, such that no one would wish anyone in the social group to unilaterally deviate therefrom.  This is a point upon which Hart receives much pushback, because he has to make a seemingly arbitrary distinction between social rules that are important enough to be real social rules, and social rules that are lesser, or not real, social rules, such as rules of etiquette.  

Hart recognizes that it would never be the case that all members of a social group, the citizenry, if you will, would accept the social rules comprising their legal system.  So, he strips the citizenry, the general public of their legal system.  He alienates them from their own social rules.  For Hart, it is enough that the citizenry not mutiny against the public officials.  He makes the body of public officials the social group whose legal system it is.  He thinks that, by so doing, he is able to argue that all of the public officials of the legal system would accept the social rules comprising the legal system. He turns the Rule of Recognition into a primary, duty imposing social rule of obligation.  But, this makes no sense, because this would mean that the public officials confer authority upon themselves and constrain themselves, according to what they will and will not accept as valid.  And, still, as Dworkin so astutely pointed out, no body of public officials accepts their social rules en masse, as a monolithic entity, devoid of unilateral deviation or disagreement or dissent.

I believe there is a way to fix Hart’s fatal mistake, and craft a legal theory that returns a social group’s legal system to the citizenry, whose legal system it is.  The solution is to apply my Modified Lewisian / Hartian Account of Social Conventions to Hart’s legal system as the union of primary, duty-imposing social rules (conventions) of obligation and secondary, power-conferring social rules (conventions) of authority.  According to my account of social conventions (rules in Hart’s parlance), what it is to be a social convention is to be a union of a primary, duty-imposing social convention of obligation, so to speak, and a secondary, power-conferring social convention of authority.  All social coordination requires authority.  

By recognizing that all social rules (really, conventions) are these unions of a primary social convention of obligation and a secondary convention of authority, Hart’s necessary connection between obligatory character and unanimity of acceptance is severed.  Social conventions are step public social goods, for which the public officials (authorities) are freeriding defectors, and the moment at which the social convention arises, the social group rests upon an equilibrium point.  All members of the social group, save the authorities, are parties to the convention.  Because no one would wish anyone party to the convention to unilaterally deviate, because the social convention (step public social good) would collapse.  Therefore, there is something closely akin to an obligation for all social group members party to the convention to continue to conform thereto.  But, the authorities (freeriding defectors) are not party to the convention, and they fare far better by continuing to defect.  The fact of their not being party to the convention also makes it the case that they are free to move the social group to alternate social conventions, by exercising their authority.  It is in this way that we can allow for social conventions (social rules) of a legal system to arise, evolve, devolve, and, eventually collapse. Likewise, dissent and disagreement and legal advocacy become part and parcel of a legal system.  Social conventions (rules) wax and wane over time, as do legal systems.  The citizenry is a major player in its own legal system, conferring power upon public officials, constraining their authority, and pressuring the evolution and devolution of their legal systems.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

Quick Update on My Legal Efforts to Restore Due Process and Equal Protection at Yale: Fight for Yale Campus Police Body Cam Footage from Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale

I just wanted to release a quick update on my legal efforts to restore Due Process and Equal Protection at Yale, including my fight for the Yale Campus Police Body Camera Footage from the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale, as well as the enforcement of my FERPA request for Yale’s internal emails about the Hate Crime Hoax at Yale.

My wonderful attorneys at Randazza Legal Group, including Jay Wolman and Marc Randazza, had submitted a terrific appeal to the CT Superior Court of the CT Freedom of Information Act Commission’s travesty of justice decision to deny the public access to the Yale Campus Police Body Camera Footage from the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale. On Tuesday, February 16th, there was a scheduling conference. I will receive a transcript thereof shortly.

The CT Freedom of Information Act Commission will file the record by Friday, February 26, 2021.

The CT Freedom of Information Act Commission and the Yale Campus Police Department will also file their answers to our complaint by Friday, February 26, 2021.

Most likely, my terrific attorneys at Randazza Legal Group, Jay Wolman and Marc Randazza, will file our brief sometime next month, in March.

I will write another blog post as soon as I receive the full transcript of the scheduling conference.

I would also very much like to turn over enforcement of my FERPA request for Yale’s internal emails having anything to do with the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale to my attorneys, but I need to raise significant donations in order to be able to do so. Yale has yet to fulfill my FERPA request as legally required.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

I Don’t Know What Else To Do, And I Don’t Know If It’s Worth It To Try

So, I’ve spent my whole life dedicated to fighting oppression in all of its many forms. I’ve been a human and civil rights activist and licensed attorney my whole life. I decided to pursue a PhD in the Philosophical Foundations of Law, so that I could complete my Saving the World Project and, well, save the world.

And, I’ve given up all hope. I now think that human beings are beyond saving, and it’s not worth it to try. I’ll probably be dead soon, which will make all of my many enemies happy. But, honestly, who cares, right? Because humanity is on a path to destruction anyway. It is beyond saving. It is beyond all redemption. I now just think that all human beings are evil demons who are perfectly happy to get an innocent human rights activist killed for a few bucks.

I just want this hellish 3 year nightmare to end. I just want the abuse to stop. I am 1 person who has already endured and barely survived myriad lifetimes worth of nightmares.

I just want the abuse to stop. I just want to be with my brothers. I just want peace.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

My Email to Rutgers University President Jonathan Holloway, Asking Him to Please Help Me Save My Life

This is my email to Rutgers University President Jonathan Holloway, asking him to please help me save my life. I kept it short and sweet. Jonathan knows me. We worked together at Yale on the anti-racism conference to honor Joyce Mitchell Cook, the first African American woman in the US to get a PhD in Philosophy, which she obtained at Yale. I am asking him to ask Rutgers Professor Taja-Nia Henderson to please retract her American University Law Review article about me that amounts to a death threat against me and puts my life in the gravest danger.

Dear President Holloway,

First, I would like to tell you how thrilled I am for you that you are the first Black President of Rutgers. I have always said so.

I know that you know that I am the entirely innocent victim of the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale.

I know that you know that I am an innocent anti-racism Yale grad student who would never in a million years engage in racism.

I am asking you to please ask Professor Taja-Nia Henderson to retract her American University Law Review article that amounts to a death threat against me and puts my life in the gravest danger.

I am trying desperately to save my life and my lifelong human and civil rights academic and legal careers.

Please help me.

All my best,

Sarah Braasch
PhD Candidate
Yale University

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

The Quick Cliff Notes Version of What Happened to Me During the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale

My tale at Yale is long and convoluted.  It really is insane what happened to me.

In a nutshell:  I stood up for the Fed Civil Rights of an Evangelical Black man on Yale’s campus in my first year in the philosophy PhD Program at Yale, in Spring 2015, and everything went downhill from there.  

I was initially ostracized by all of the other philosophy grad students who would literally get up and walk out of a room, if I walked into it.  It devastated me to the point that I sought mental health treatment while at Yale, a point of which much was made by the Administration and my tormentors during the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale.

I became a target of the Yale Admin at this time, because the philosophy grad students were not content to have made me a social pariah within the philosophy department, and they went to the Yale Administration to have me disciplined and even expelled for being an unWoke civil libertarian and Free Speech advocate who opposes hate crime legislation as grossly unconstitutional.  I was widely known and despised across Yale’s campus as an unWoke anti-LGBTQ bigot.  I experienced multiple incidents of harassment in student housing related to my apostate status.

This is why, when Lolade Siyonbola and Jean Louis Reneson went to the Yale Administration after the non-event on February 24th, 2018, during which I was the only person who was harassed, and falsely accused me of having perpetrated a racist hate crime comparable to a lynching, the Yale Administration were thrilled to embrace this obviously false accusation.  In truth, I worked on the issues of implicit bias and police brutality with the Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School.

The Yale Administration wanted me to participate in a Maoist struggle session, a town hall, at which I was supposed to profess my racism and help teach the other members of the Yale community how not to be racist like me.  I told them to go jump in a lake.  I threatened legal action if they continued to harass me.  And, I demanded retractions of all of the false statements about me.  

So, this is when the Yale Administration decided to participate in the Living or Napping While Black Hate Crime Hoax at Yale.  They wanted me expelled.  They wanted me dead.  I now believe that the Yale Admin was actually instructing Lolade Siyonbola and Jean Louis Reneson on what to do.  I was stalked across campus and terrorized in my isolated Yale dorm room for months.  I begged the Yale Admin and Yale Campus Police Chief Ronnell Higgins to stop the harassment.  They repeatedly assured me that I could call the campus police at any time for any reason whatsoever, even if I was unsure if such a call was necessary.

When Lolade Siyonbola filmed me on May 8th, 2018, I didn’t even know I was being filmed.  I now know that this was a last ditch effort before flying home to Nigeria the next day to wreak her vengeance upon me for her delusional, obsessive personal vendetta against me.  

The Yale Admin led the subsequent global vilification and defamation campaign against me, including in the Fake News Press, in an effort to get me killed and destroy my life and career.  My life has been destroyed.  I am still deluged by death and rape threats.  I am still more or less in hiding.  My lifelong human and civil rights academic and legal careers are over.  I am defamed to this day, on an almost daily basis, as a genocidal villain who tries to lynch Black students at Yale via the Yale Campus Police.

I am pursuing legal action against Yale and the CT FOI Commission to secure the Yale Police body camera footage from May 8th, 2018, to release it to the public.  We have an appeal in the courts.  
I did get press initially when I appealed to the CT FOI Commission, but this was only because the mainstream press thought that they could generate more moral outrage industry money by vilifying me all over again.  No one is covering my current appeal.

I have a FERPA request, which Yale said that they would honor, but I have yet to receive anything, and I no longer have hope that this is any kind of an indication that the Yale Corporation has come to their senses.

I have a blog, where I have released a ton of pdf’s of documents and emails.  I have a YouTube channel that hasn’t taken off as I would have liked, but it has definitely helped me get the truth out there, and I am very active on Twitter.  I lost my Twitter account at the end of 2019, but I fought tooth and nail to get it back, and I finally did, obviously.

That’s my story in a nutshell.  Like I said, it’s pretty insane.  Class also played a huge role in what happened to me at Yale.  I was also despised for being a crazy, old poor white trash interloper who dared to be unWoke and who was very successful.

I am hoping to appear on another podcast this coming weekend.  

At this point, I think everyone is pretending that I don’t exist, so that they won’t be held accountable for what they did to me.

I just said today that I think I’m constitutionally incapable of walking away until I achieve some semblance of Justice, not just for me, but for all of the cancelled.

I will not rest until we have restored Due Process and Equal Protection at Yale and Smith College and on campuses across the US and everywhere.

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

My Email to Vice President of Princeton, Hilary Parker, Beseeching Her to Help Me Save My Life and Human Rights Career

The following is my email to Vice President of Princeton, Hilary Parker, asking her to help me save my life and human rights career, asking her to please ask Princeton Professor Imani Perry to tell the truth and ask for a retraction and apology from UC Hastings Law School, because of her protege’s disgusting article about me, T. Anansi Wilson, in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, a collection of disgusting lies about me meant to get me killed and drive me to suicide as an act of vengeance. Of course, Professor Perry knows me, and knows that I am an entirely innocent anti-racism Yale graduate student. She worked with me at Yale on an anti-racism conference, along with my advisor, Jason Stanley.

Dear Vice President Parker,

I hope this email finds you well.  

Unfortunately, for my part, I have been living in a hellish nightmare for the past two and a half years.  I beseech you for your assistance.

I was recently grossly defamed in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by T. Anansi Wilson, a protege of Professor Imani Perry of Princeton.  I believe that this was an act of vengeance, meant to get me killed and drive me to suicide.

I assure you that I am an entirely innocent anti-racism Yale grad student, and this was completely known to Professor Wilson’s advisor, Professor Imani Perry of Princeton, with whom I had worked at Yale, on an anti-racism conference, the Ideology Conference, along with my advisor at Yale, Jason Stanley.

My life has been destroyed.  My lifelong human and civil rights academic and legal careers have been destroyed.  All I want is for the defamation to stop.  I can’t take any more abuse.  I have nearly killed myself countless times during the past two and a half years.  I am still in hiding.  I am still deluged by death and rape threats.  I am still defamed as a genocidal villain who lynches Black students at Yale via the Yale Campus Police on a near daily basis.

I beg of you, please help me.  I work at a Legal Aid Center.  I help people.  That’s what I do now.  I know that my dream of a life in academia has been stolen from me.  I just want to be left in peace.

The defamation in T. Anansi Wilson’s article is actionable.  I ask for a retraction and apology.  I ask Professor Imani Perry, who could not be more aware that I am an entirely innocent anti-racism Yale grad student, to ask for a retraction and apology.  

Please help me save my life.  I beg this of you.  I am an entirely innocent person whose life has been decimated.  All I ever wanted to do with my life is help people and make the world a better place. 

Now, I just want to live.  

Thank you so much for your kind assistance in this matter.

Best regards,

Sarah Braasch

PhD Candidate

Yale University

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g

My Email to Chancellor and Dean David Faigman of the UC Hastings Law School, Beseeching Him to Help Me Save My Life and Human Rights Career

The following is my email to UC Hasting Law School Chancellor and Dean, David Faigman. I ask for a retraction and apology of Adjunct Professor T. Anansi Wilson’s disgusting and despicable Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly article about me, which can only be construed as a death threat against me, as an act of revenge, and an attempt to drive me to suicide, an innocent anti-racism Yale grad student:

Dear Chancellor and Dean Faigman,


I hope this email finds you well.  

Unfortunately, for my part, I have been living in a hellish nightmare for the past two and a half years.  I beseech you for your assistance.

I was recently grossly defamed in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by a new addition to your faculty, T. Anansi Wilson.

I assure you that I am an entirely innocent anti-racism Yale grad student, and this was completely known to Professor Wilson’s advisor, Professor Imani Perry of Princeton, with whom I had worked at Yale, on an anti-racism conference, the Ideology Conference, along with my advisor at Yale, Jason Stanley.

My life has been destroyed.  My lifelong human and civil rights academic and legal careers have been destroyed.  All I want is for the defamation to stop.  I can’t take any more abuse.  I have nearly killed myself countless times during the past two and a half years.  I am still in hiding.  I am still deluged by death and rape threats.  I am still defamed as a genocidal villain who lynches Black students at Yale via the Yale Campus Police on a near daily basis.

I beg of you, please help me.  I work at a Legal Aid Center.  I help people.  That’s what I do now.  I know that my dream of a life in academia has been stolen from me.  I just want to be left in peace.

The defamation in T. Anansi Wilson’s article is actionable.  I ask for a retraction and apology.

Please help me save my life.  I beg this of you.  I am an entirely innocent person whose life has been decimated.  All I ever wanted to do with my life is help people and make the world a better place.  Now, I just want to live.  

Thank you so much for your kind assistance in this matter.

Best regards,

Sarah Braasch

PhD Candidate

Yale University

If you wish to support me, as I seek justice, it would mean the world to me. Here are my PayPalMe and GoFundMe links. 

PayPalMe:  https://www.paypal.me/SarahBraasch

GoFundMe:  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/w6xyg-sarah-braasch-legal-fund

You can follow me on twitter here:  https://twitter.com/sarahbraasch1?lang=en

Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4xV2R6mTVJhAu9OQzwp5g